The U.S. Constitution Was Never Perfect

W. Cleon Skousen
W. Cleon Skousen (Wikipedia)

There’s been an increase in the number of Americans calling themselves constitutionalists in the last several years. They believe the U.S. Constitution should be interpreted using the concept of originalism, wherein the courts should identify the exact intent of the Framers of the Constitution and render legal decisions based solely upon that “original” meaning. But one of the problems with this approach is the difficulty of defining the exact intent of a document that was written more than 220 years ago.

Most of these constitutionalists also hold far-right political views and like to complain about how our country is in trouble because of modern Supreme Court decisions. Some of them go so far as to claim that the court’s recent decisions have violated God’s will. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, for instance, teaches that the original Constitution was divinely inspired because God was integrally involved in its formulation. Some Mormons have taken this belief much further. The late W. Cleon Skousen founded the National Center for Constitutional Studies (NCCS), a conservative, religious-themed constitutionalist political activist organization. According to the NCCS, the founding of the United States was a divine miracle and we must reject the tyrannical and sinful nature of the modern U.S. federal government. (Before he founded the NCCS Skousen was fired from being the police chief of Salt Lake City for abusing citizens, and was denounced by the city’s mayor as a “little Hitler.” After that he taught a traveling anti-Communist class nationwide in which he liked to denounce the John F. Kennedy administration for being Marxist.) Skousen died in 2006, but he still has many admirers, including Arizona politician Russell Pearce and political commentator Glenn Beck.

Worshipping the Original U.S. Constitution is Irrational

Religious constitutionalists say there are historical documents about the 1787 Constitutional Convention which prove the Constitution was divinely inspired. The “Father of the Constitution” James Madison, for example, wrote to Thomas Jefferson afterwards that it was “impossible to consider the degree of concord which ultimately prevailed as less than a miracle.” George Washington later wrote, “To that superintending Power alone is our retraction from the brink of ruin to be attributed.” But closer examination of quotes from the Framers indicate they believed the true miracle was that all of the young nation’s disparate political interests were able to come to an agreement on a political system that could replace the completely dysfunctional Articles of Confederation, which had served as the nation’s first constitution. Yes, they were very proud of the original Constitution, and realized it was an historic document in the history of the world, but it’s clear they didn’t think it was perfect.

Evidence of this is included in the original Constitution. It consisted of just 7 articles, with one of these, Article 5, describing the process for making constitutional amendments. The first 10 amendments, called the Bill of Rights, had to be promised to the states of Massachusetts, Virginia, and New York to assure their ratification of the original constitution. A perfect original document wouldn’t have needed to be amended. And there are now 27 amendments.

These amendments speak to some of the major deficiencies in the original Constitution. The most important, of course, was the 13th Amendment, which abolished slavery when it was ratified in 1865. (Several of the Constitution’s original Framers were slave owners, including James Madison.) The man who assassinated President Abraham Lincoln in 1865, Confederate terrorist John Wilkes Booth, wrote, “looking upon African slavery from the same stand-point held by the noble framers of our constitution, I for one, have ever considered it one of the greatest blessings (both for themselves and us,) that God has ever bestowed upon a favored nation.”

The 17th Amendment was another important one because it gave voters the ability to directly elect U.S. senators when it was ratified in 1913. And the 19th Amendment, which gave women the right to vote, was ratified in 1920.

Furthermore, these self-proclaimed constitutionalists ignore the bad Supreme Court decisions which resulted from a strict interpretation of the original Constitution, such as the 1857 Dred Scott v. Sandford decision that confirmed the legality of slavery because the Framers of the Constitution viewed blacks as “beings of an inferior order, and altogether unfit to associate with the white race, either in social or political relations, and so far inferior that they had no rights which the white man was bound to respect.”

Constitutionalists spend a lot of time complaining about the federal courts using the common sense “living document” concept wherein the interpretation of the Constitution includes consideration of modern day realities the original Framers could not have imagined. Any court decision they politically disagree with is given the Orwellian label of “judicial activism,” and the judge that issued it is demonized.

Their favorite topic is the Constitution’s Second Amendment, which states that, “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” They interpret this to mean that any form of government gun control is unconstitutional, regardless of any other public concerns.

It’s obvious that most constitutionalists are just exploiting the concept of originalism as a vehicle to promote their conservative views, because worshipping the original Constitution and its Framers is irrational.

The Universe Is So Vast It’s Beyond Our Comprehension

god
Does God look like a hairy old white man?

Astronomers recently published a study in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences that virtually proves we are not alone in the universe. Using data collected by NASA, they estimated that, in our galaxy alone, there are a least 8.8 billion stars with Earth-sized planets orbiting at a distance which makes their surface temperatures conducive to life. And that’s just our galaxy. There are billions of other galaxies out there.

Some people ask that, if the existence of life on other planets is true, then why haven’t we been able to contact or detect any alien civilizations? That’s a huge and interesting rabbit hole that I don’t want to go down now. But I will say that I personally doubt that interstellar travel is possible, considering the enormous distances involved, although we might be able to establish communication with other planets.

But what does the existence of extraterrestrial life mean in regards to the Earth’s major religions? I used to have a coworker who was a lifelong devout Christian. When I asked him this question he said he didn’t care about all of those other planets, just this one, and that Jesus Christ was our god and watches over our planet. I thought his opinion contradicted one of the primary beliefs of the followers of the monotheistic Abrahamic religions – that God is an all-powerful and all-knowing being. But it made more sense to me than what we hear from more orthodox religious believers.

Every Sunday, for example, you can find numerous Protestant preachers on television taking a single word from the Bible and inventing a modern meaning for it in a long, windy sermon. Or there’s the Catholic rule that only men can be ordained as priests. Then there’s the odd dietary restrictions followed by the Jews and Muslims. How about the Mormon practice of baptizing dead people?

I could go on for a long time about the particular absurdities of Earth’s various religions. But a common thread I see in all of them is that they are a way for men to designate themselves as spiritual leaders, and thereby feed their own egos, and attain a position of power they couldn’t otherwise achieve. They protect their status by requiring strict adherence to their religion’s dogmas, often through the use of fear. There isn’t a better example than the Taliban mullahs ordering the killing of girls who dare to pursue a modern education.

Most of the world’s religions teach us that if we live virtuous lives, we’ll end up in some kind of better place after we die. Knowing what we now know about the universe, does it really make any sense to believe that this afterlife looks like Earth, or that the God presiding over it looks like a male human? We better start thinking bigger or by the time those aliens out there try to contact us there won’t be anybody left here for them to talk to.

Israel’s Odd Democracy

Israeli flag
Israeli flag

On October 4th the Israeli Supreme Court ruled that residents of that country could not identify themselves as Israeli in the nation’s registry. The decision was the result of some Israeli citizens, most of them Jews, demanding to be able to call themselves Israelis, a secular term, instead of having to identify themselves as belonging to a particular religion or ethnic group.

All of the residents of Israel, no matter their religion, are officially citizens of the country. But, according to the court’s decision, there’s officially no such thing as an Israeli. The court explained its decision by reiterating that Judaism is the official state religion of Israel, and that purpose of the creation of Israel was to be a Jewish state for Jewish people.

The Israeli government isn’t a theocracy, and all of its residents are considered to be citizens, but it’s difficult to believe that non-Jewish Israelis don’t experience discrimination in this legal environment. In fact, the goal of the group that petitioned the court was to strengthen their country in the long run by helping to end discrimination against non-Jews by the creation of an official Israeli identity.

Israel is one of our important military allies in the Middle East, but American politicians are fond of saying that a big reason we support Israel is that they are the only democracy in the Middle East. But it isn’t an American style of democracy.

Update

On January 7, 2018, the government of Israel published a list of 20 international organizations whose members are prohibited from entering the country. They are banned because their groups advocate a boycott of Israel for its failure to comply with international law in regards to its policies towards Palestinians. The list includes six U.S. groups, including two run by Jewish activists.

Page 5 of 6
1 3 4 5 6